NUNIFY
•
REDISIGN
ROLE
Product Designer
TIMELINE
January - February
2025
SKILLS
Product Designer
Product Strategy
Visual Design
OVERVIEW
Check-in shouldn't need a team to run
At most events, check-in involves at least three people: someone managing the list, a volunteer scanning badges, and staff handling the inevitable exceptions. It works until the internet drops, a queue forms, or a first-time attendee can't find their QR code.
This project was Nunify's check-in app a product used at real events, with a real brief: reduce the steps. What we shipped went further than that. We separated two things that had always been bundled together, and pushed check-in toward something that didn't need a volunteer at all.
Operational design
Mapping how check-in actually runs on event day not the happy path, but the moment the wifi goes down and the queue starts forming.
Flow reduction
Tracing every step a volunteer took and asking which ones only existed because the system required them not because they added anything.
Self-service design
Designing for the attendee as the primary actor with the organiser's brand, not Nunify's, as the visible surface.
PROBLEM
Check-in was slow, staff-dependent, and blind.
The existing flow assumed a dedicated volunteer at every station: pick up a device, find the attendee on the list, scan the QR code, confirm. Four interactions per person. Multiply that by 300 attendees and you have a 40-minute queue before the event has started.
"By the time I'd found them on the list, they'd already pulled out their phone and shown me the code themselves." — Volunteer, event debrief
RESEARCH
3 Interviews
Stakeholder perspectives, organiser, volunteer, and attendee
1 Primary Contraint
Eliminate dependency on stable internet connectivity during the check-in moment
Business direction
Reduce steps. Research clarified where the steps were actually coming from
SOLUTION
Redesign check-in around two outcomes: no queue, and data that stays.
Every design decision in this project connects back to one of those two things. The mode separation, the self check-in surface, the offline validation, the session tracking dashboard none of them are features for their own sake. They exist because the queue needed to go, and because the organiser deserved to finish an event knowing what actually happened at it.
CORE FLOWS
Separate registration and check-in into distinct modes
Previously, onsite registration and check-in were options within the same host flow. Separating them into two modes meant a walk-in gets a dedicated flow that doesn't slow anyone else down. The queue shortens because the exception stops blocking the rule.
Self check-in as the primary mode, not a fallback
The old system was built around a volunteer holding the device. Flipping that assumption meant redesigning for an attendee who has never used it immediate confirmation, clear pass/fail, offline validation so connectivity stops being a failure mode. The volunteer becomes optional. At smaller events, unnecessary entirely.
Attendee Tracking across the full event day
Check-in data answers three questions organisers never had answers to before: which ticket type actually converts to attendance, which locations drew the most footprint, and which sessions people showed up for versus skipped. None of this required new data collection it was always being recorded. The design work was surfacing it in a form the organiser could act on before planning their next event.
Event branding on the check-in surface
The attendee is at someone else's event. The check-in surface follows the event's brand not Nunify's. When there's no volunteer present, the interface is the first impression. It should look like it belongs there.
SET UP
Configure once, track everything
The assumption we were designing toward: if the organiser sets up each station with a location and ticket type before the event, every scan would automatically carry that context. No manual tagging, no post-event cleanup the data would just be attributed correctly as a byproduct of setup.
The configuration screen was built around that logic. Each station declares what it is which location it covers, which ticket types it accepts, whether check-in is automatic or needs confirmation. Two minutes of setup per station, before the doors open.
If the assumption holds, the footprint data, ticket conversion rates, and session counts don't need any extra effort to collect. They're a byproduct of how the station was configured. That was the bet.
REFLECTION
Check-in is a solved problem until the technology changes
QR codes work. But they still require the attendee to do something. That moment of friction is small, but it exists.
NFC wristbands, face recognition, app-based entry — each removes a step. Check-in becomes something that happens to you, not something you do.
No queue to manage means no moment of contact. But the data layer becomes more valuable, not less real-time crowd density, movement patterns, sessions filling up before they start. The organiser's job shifts from managing entry to reading the room as it happens.